New here?Read the story.Hear both sides on The Floor.Cast your verdict. No signup needed.
Deliberation Open
Case #10First Amendment

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

L.B. Sullivan, a Montgomery city commissioner, sued the New York Times for defamation over a full-page civil rights ad that contained minor factual errors. An Alabama jury awarded him large damages. The Supreme Court reversed unanimously, ruling that public officials must prove actual malice to win a defamation case. Some argue this near-absolute press protection enables modern misinformation. Did the Court draw the right line between free press and accountability?

Your Progress
Read
2
Exhibits
3
Argued
4
Voted

What happened

In March 1960, civil rights leaders take out a full-page ad in the New York Times titled "Heed Their Rising Voices." It describes police violence against student protesters in the South, and asks for donations to defend Martin Luther King Jr. from perjury charges in Alabama. The ad contains several factual errors. Dr. King had been arrested four times, not seven. The students had sung the National Anthem, not "My Country, Tis of Thee." L.B. Sullivan, an elected commissioner in Montgomery who supervised the city police, was not named in the ad. He sues the Times for libel anyway, and a Montgomery jury awards him five hundred thousand dollars.

Why this is contested

The Times argues that no public discourse is possible if a public official can recover damages every time a critic gets a small fact wrong, and that southern courts are weaponizing libel law to drain the civil rights movement of resources and silence its allies. Sullivan argues that his professional reputation suffered real harm, that publishers have a duty to verify what they print, and that no one is above accountability for false statements.

What's at stake

If the Times wins, public officials must clear a near-impossible bar to win a libel claim, and the press operates with the breathing room it needs to scrutinize power. If Sullivan wins, every editor with limited resources thinks twice before printing criticism, and the cost of saying something true but imperfect could ruin a paper.