New here?Read the story.Hear both sides on The Floor.Cast your verdict. No signup needed.
Deliberation Open
Case #7Civil Rights
Obergefell v. Kasich
James Obergefell sued Ohio after the state refused to list him as the surviving spouse on his husband's death certificate, following their legal marriage in Maryland. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the Constitution guarantees same-sex couples the right to marry. Dissenting justices argued the court had no authority to redefine marriage - that it belonged to voters and legislatures. Was this judicial overreach, or justice long overdue?
Your Progress
✓
Read2
Exhibits3
Argued4
VotedWhat happened
James Obergefell and John Arthur have been together for twenty years. In 2013, John is dying of ALS. He cannot walk, speak clearly, or be moved easily. The couple charters a medical plane to Maryland, where same-sex marriage is legal, and they marry on the tarmac. John dies three months later. When Ohio, their home state, refuses to list James as the surviving spouse on the death certificate, James sues. Ohio's governor John Kasich is named as defendant. The case is joined with several others and reaches the Supreme Court as a single question: must states recognize marriages between same-sex couples?
Why this is contested
Obergefell argues that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection regardless of sexual orientation, and that being denied a basic civil status, the legal recognition of marriage, causes concrete harms his husband did not deserve. Ohio argues that marriage has been defined as between a man and a woman for the entirety of American history, and that the question of who can marry is one for voters and state legislatures to decide, not courts.
What's at stake
If Obergefell wins, same-sex marriage becomes a constitutional right enforceable in every state. If Ohio wins, marriage equality remains a patchwork: legal in some states, not others, and contingent on who is in power.